modeltools¶
This module provides features for applying and implementing hydrological models.
Module modeltools implements the following members:
AideSequencesAide sequences of model modeltools.
FactorSequencesFactor sequences of model modeltools.
FluxSequencesFlux sequences of model modeltools.
InletSequencesInlet sequences of model modeltools.
InputSequencesInput sequences of model modeltools.
LogSequencesLog sequences of model modeltools.
OutletSequencesOutlet sequences of model modeltools.
ReceiverSequencesReceiver sequences of model modeltools.
SenderSequencesSender sequences of model modeltools.
StateSequencesState sequences of model modeltools.
MethodBase class for defining (hydrological) calculation methods.
IndexPropertyBase class for index descriptors likeIdx_Sim.
Idx_SimThe simulation step index.
Idx_HRUThe hydrological response unit index.
Idx_SegmentThe segment index.
Idx_RunThe run index.
ModelBase class for all hydrological models.
RunModelBase class forAdHocModelandSegmentModelthat introduces so-called “run methods”, which need to be executed in the order of their positions in theRUN_METHODStuple.
AdHocModelBase class for models solving the underlying differential equations in an “ad hoc manner”.
SegmentModelBase class for (routing) models that solve the underlying differential equations “segment-wise”.
SolverModelBase class for hydrological models, which solve ordinary differential equations with numerical integration algorithms.
NumConstsELSConfiguration options for using the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” implemented by classELSModel.
NumVarsELSIntermediate results of the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” implemented by classELSModel.
ELSModelBase class for hydrological models using the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” for solving ordinary differential equations.
SubmodelBase class for implementing “submodels” that serve to deal with (possibly complicated) general mathematical algorithms (e.g. root-finding algorithms) within hydrological model methods.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Method[source]¶
Bases:
objectBase class for defining (hydrological) calculation methods.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.IndexProperty[source]¶
Bases:
objectBase class for index descriptors like
Idx_Sim.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Idx_Sim[source]¶
Bases:
IndexPropertyThe simulation step index.
Some model methods require knowing the index of the current simulation step (with respect to the initialisation period), which one usually updates by passing it to
simulate(). However, you can change it manually via theIdx_Simdescriptor, which is often beneficial during testing:>>> from hydpy.models.hland_v1 import * >>> parameterstep("1d") >>> model.idx_sim 0 >>> model.idx_sim = 1 >>> model.idx_sim 1
Like other objects of
IndexPropertysubclasses,Idx_Simobjects are aware of their name:>>> Model.idx_sim.name 'idx_sim'
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Idx_HRU[source]¶
Bases:
IndexPropertyThe hydrological response unit index.
The documentation on class
Idx_Simexplains the general purpose and handling ofIndexPropertyinstances.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Idx_Segment[source]¶
Bases:
IndexPropertyThe segment index.
The documentation on class
Idx_Simexplains the general purpose and handling ofIndexPropertyinstances.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Idx_Run[source]¶
Bases:
IndexPropertyThe run index.
The documentation on class
Idx_Simexplains the general purpose and handling ofIndexPropertyinstances.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Model[source]¶
Bases:
objectBase class for all hydrological models.
Class
Modelprovides everything to create a usable application model, except methodsimulate(). See classesAdHocModelandELSModel, which implement this method.Class
Modeldoes not prepare the strongly required attributes parameters and sequences during initialisation. You need to add them manually whenever you want to prepare a workableModelobject on your own (see the factory functionsprepare_model()andparameterstep(), which do this regularly).Similar to parameters and sequences, there is also the dynamic masks attribute, making all predefined masks of the actual model type available within a
Masksobject:>>> from hydpy.models.hland_v1 import * >>> parameterstep("1d") >>> model.masks complete of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks land of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks upperzone of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks snow of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks soil of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks field of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks forest of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks ilake of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks glacier of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks sealed of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks noglacier of module hydpy.models.hland.hland_masks
You can use these masks, for example, to average the zone-specific precipitation values handled by sequence
PC. When passing no argument, methodaverage_values()applies the complete mask. For example, pass mask land to average the values of all zones except those of typeILAKE:>>> nmbzones(4) >>> zonetype(FIELD, FOREST, GLACIER, ILAKE) >>> zonearea.values = 1.0 >>> fluxes.pc = 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0 >>> fluxes.pc.average_values() 4.0 >>> fluxes.pc.average_values(model.masks.land) 3.0
- parameters: parametertools.Parameters¶
- sequences: sequencetools.Sequences¶
- masks: masktools.Masks¶
- idx_sim¶
The simulation step index.
- cymodel: typingtools.CyModelProtocol | None¶
- element: devicetools.Element | None¶
- connect() None[source]¶
Connect all
LinkSequenceobjects and the selectedInputSequenceandOutputSequenceobjects of the actual model to the correspondingNodeSequenceobjects.You cannot connect any sequences until the
Modelobject itself is connected to anElementobject referencing the requiredNodeobjects:>>> from hydpy import prepare_model >>> prepare_model("musk_classic").connect() Traceback (most recent call last): ... AttributeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `input` sequences of the model handled by element `?`, the following error occurred: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'inputs'
The application model
musk_classiccan receive inflow from an arbitrary number of upstream nodes and passes its outflow to a single downstream node (note that propertymodelof classElementcalls methodconnect()automatically):>>> from hydpy import Element, Node >>> in1 = Node("in1", variable="Q") >>> in2 = Node("in2", variable="Q") >>> out1 = Node("out1", variable="Q")
>>> element1 = Element("element1", inlets=(in1, in2), outlets=out1) >>> element1.model = prepare_model("musk_classic")
Now all connections work as expected:
>>> in1.sequences.sim = 1.0 >>> in2.sequences.sim = 2.0 >>> out1.sequences.sim = 3.0 >>> element1.model.sequences.inlets.q q(1.0, 2.0) >>> element1.model.sequences.outlets.q q(3.0) >>> element1.model.sequences.inlets.q *= 2.0 >>> element1.model.sequences.outlets.q *= 2.0 >>> in1.sequences.sim sim(2.0) >>> in2.sequences.sim sim(4.0) >>> out1.sequences.sim sim(6.0)
To show some possible errors and related error messages, we define three additional nodes, two handling variables different from discharge (Q):
>>> in3 = Node("in3", variable="X") >>> out2 = Node("out2", variable="Q") >>> out3 = Node("out3", variable="X")
Link sequence names must match the variable a node is handling:
>>> element2 = Element("element2", inlets=(in1, in2), outlets=out3) >>> element2.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `outlet` sequences of the model handled by element `element2`, the following error occurred: Sequence `q` of element `element2` cannot be connected due to no available node handling variable `Q`.
One can connect a 0-dimensional link sequence to a single node sequence only:
>>> element3 = Element("element3", inlets=(in1, in2), outlets=(out1, out2)) >>> element3.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `outlet` sequences of the model handled by element `element3`, the following error occurred: Sequence `q` cannot be connected as it is 0-dimensional but multiple nodes are available which are handling variable `Q`.
Method
connect()generally reports about unusable node sequences:>>> element4 = Element("element4", inlets=(in1, in2), outlets=(out1, out3)) >>> element4.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `outlet` sequences of the model handled by element `element4`, the following error occurred: The following nodes have not been connected to any sequences: out3.
>>> element5 = Element("element5", inlets=(in1, in2, in3), outlets=out1) >>> element5.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `inlet` sequences of the model handled by element `element5`, the following error occurred: The following nodes have not been connected to any sequences: in3.
>>> element6 = Element("element6", inlets=in1, outlets=out1, receivers=in2) >>> element6.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `receiver` sequences of the model handled by element `element6`, the following error occurred: The following nodes have not been connected to any sequences: in2.
>>> element7 = Element("element7", inlets=in1, outlets=out1, senders=in2) >>> element7.model = prepare_model("musk_classic") Traceback (most recent call last): ... RuntimeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `sender` sequences of the model handled by element `element7`, the following error occurred: The following nodes have not been connected to any sequences: in2.
The above examples explain how to connect link sequences to their nodes. Such connections are relatively hard requirements (
musk_classicdefinitively needs inflow provided from a node, which the node itself typically receives from another model). In contrast, connections between input or output sequences and nodes are optional. If one defines such a connection for an input sequence, it receives data from the related node; otherwise, it uses its individually managed data, usually read from a file. If one defines such a connection for an output sequence, it passes its internal data to the related node; otherwise, nothing happens.We demonstrate this functionality by focussing on the input sequences
TandPand the output sequencesQ0andUZof application modelhland_v1.Tuses its own data (which we define manually, but we could read it from a file as well), whereasPgets its data from node inp1. Flux sequenceQ0and state sequenceUZpass their data to two separate output nodes, whereas all other fluxes and states do not. This functionality requires telling each node which sequence it should connect to, which we do by passing the sequence types (or the globally available aliases hland_P, hland_Q0, and hland_UZ) to the variable keyword of different node objects:>>> from hydpy import pub >>> from hydpy.inputs import hland_P >>> from hydpy.outputs import hland_Q0, hland_UZ >>> pub.timegrids = "2000-01-01", "2000-01-06", "1d"
>>> inp1 = Node("inp1", variable=hland_P) >>> outp1 = Node("outp1", variable=hland_Q0) >>> outp2 = Node("outp2", variable=hland_UZ) >>> element8 = Element( ... "element8", outlets=out1, inputs=inp1, outputs=[outp1, outp2]) >>> element8.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") >>> element8.prepare_inputseries() >>> element8.model.idx_sim = 2 >>> element8.model.sequences.inputs.t.series = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 >>> inp1.sequences.sim(9.0) >>> element8.model.load_data() >>> element8.model.sequences.inputs.t t(3.0) >>> element8.model.sequences.inputs.p p(9.0) >>> element8.model.sequences.fluxes.q0 = 99.0 >>> element8.model.sequences.states.uz = 999.0 >>> element8.model.update_outputs() >>> outp1.sequences.sim sim(99.0) >>> outp2.sequences.sim sim(999.0)
Instead of using single
InputSequenceandOutputSequencesubclasses, one can create and apply fused variables, combining multiple subclasses (see the documentation on classFusedVariablefor more information and a more realistic example):>>> from hydpy import FusedVariable >>> from hydpy.inputs import lland_Nied >>> from hydpy.outputs import lland_QDGZ >>> Precip = FusedVariable("Precip", hland_P, lland_Nied) >>> inp2 = Node("inp2", variable=Precip) >>> FastRunoff = FusedVariable("FastRunoff", hland_Q0, lland_QDGZ) >>> outp3 = Node("outp3", variable=FastRunoff) >>> element9 = Element("element9", outlets=out1, inputs=inp2, outputs=outp3) >>> element9.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") >>> inp2.sequences.sim(9.0) >>> element9.model.load_data() >>> element9.model.sequences.inputs.p p(9.0) >>> element9.model.sequences.fluxes.q0 = 99.0 >>> element9.model.update_outputs() >>> outp3.sequences.sim sim(99.0)
Method
connect()reports if one of the given fused variables does not find a fitting sequence:>>> from hydpy.inputs import lland_TemL >>> Wrong = FusedVariable("Wrong", lland_Nied, lland_TemL) >>> inp3 = Node("inp3", variable=Wrong) >>> element10 = Element("element10", outlets=out1, inputs=inp3) >>> element10.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `input` sequences of the model handled by element `element10`, the following error occurred: None of the input sequences of model `hland_v1` is among the sequences of the fused variable `Wrong` of node `inp3`.
>>> outp4 = Node("outp4", variable=Wrong) >>> element11 = Element("element11", outlets=out1, outputs=outp4) >>> element11.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `output` sequences of the model handled by element `element11`, the following error occurred: None of the output sequences of model `hland_v1` is among the sequences of the fused variable `Wrong` of node `outp4`.
Selecting wrong sequences results in the following error messages:
>>> outp5 = Node("outp5", variable=hland_Q0) >>> element12 = Element("element12", outlets=out1, inputs=outp5) >>> element12.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `input` sequences of the model handled by element `element12`, the following error occurred: No input sequence of model `hland_v1` is named `q0`.
>>> inp5 = Node("inp5", variable=hland_P) >>> element13 = Element("element13", outlets=out1, outputs=inp5) >>> element13.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `output` sequences of the model handled by element `element13`, the following error occurred: No factor, flux, or state sequence of model `hland_v1` is named `p`.
So far, you can build connections to 0-dimensional output sequences only:
>>> from hydpy.models.hland.hland_fluxes import PC >>> outp6 = Node("outp6", variable=PC) >>> element14 = Element("element14", outlets=out1, outputs=outp6) >>> element14.model = prepare_model("hland_v1") Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: While trying to build the node connection of the `output` sequences of the model handled by element `element14`, the following error occurred: Only connections with 0-dimensional output sequences are supported, but sequence `pc` is 1-dimensional.
- property name: str¶
Name of the model type.
For base models,
namecorresponds to the package name:>>> from hydpy import prepare_model >>> hland = prepare_model("hland") >>> hland.name 'hland'
For application models,
nameto corresponds the module name:>>> hland_v1 = prepare_model("hland_v1") >>> hland_v1.name 'hland_v1'
This last example has only technical reasons:
>>> hland.name 'hland'
- abstract simulate(idx: int) None[source]¶
Perform a simulation run over a single simulation time step.
- load_data() None[source]¶
Call method
load_data()of attribute sequences.When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- save_data(idx: int) None[source]¶
Call method
save_data()of attribute sequences.When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- update_inlets() None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “INLET_METHODS” in the defined order.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import AdHocModel, Method >>> class print_1(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(1) >>> class print_2(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(2) >>> class Test(AdHocModel): ... INLET_METHODS = print_1, print_2 >>> Test().update_inlets() 1 2
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- update_outlets() None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “OUTLET_METHODS” in the defined order.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import AdHocModel, Method >>> class print_1(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(1) >>> class print_2(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(2) >>> class Test(AdHocModel): ... OUTLET_METHODS = print_1, print_2 >>> Test().update_outlets() 1 2
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- update_receivers(idx: int) None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “RECEIVER_METHODS” in the defined order.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import AdHocModel, Method >>> class print_1(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(test.idx_sim+1) >>> class print_2(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(test.idx_sim+2) >>> class Test(AdHocModel): ... RECEIVER_METHODS = print_1, print_2 >>> test = Test() >>> test.update_receivers(1) 2 3
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- update_senders(idx: int) None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “SENDER_METHODS” in the defined order.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import AdHocModel, Method >>> class print_1(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(test.idx_sim+1) >>> class print_2(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(test.idx_sim+2) >>> class Test(AdHocModel): ... SENDER_METHODS = print_1, print_2 >>> test = Test() >>> test.update_senders(1) 2 3
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- new2old() None[source]¶
Call method
new2old()of subattribute sequences.states.When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- update_outputs() None[source]¶
Call method
update_outputs()of attributesequences.When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- classmethod get_methods() Iterator[Method][source]¶
Convenience method for iterating through all methods selected by a
Modelsubclass.>>> from hydpy.models import hland_v1 >>> for method in hland_v1.Model.get_methods(): ... print(method.__name__) Calc_TC_V1 Calc_TMean_V1 ... Calc_QT_V1 Pass_Q_v1
Note that function
get_methods()returns the “raw”Methodobjects instead of the modified Python or Cython functions used for performing calculations.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.RunModel[source]¶
Bases:
ModelBase class for
AdHocModelandSegmentModelthat introduces so-called “run methods”, which need to be executed in the order of their positions in theRUN_METHODStuple.- METHOD_GROUPS: ClassVar[Tuple[str, ...]] = ('RECEIVER_METHODS', 'INLET_METHODS', 'RUN_METHODS', 'ADD_METHODS', 'OUTLET_METHODS', 'SENDER_METHODS')¶
- simulate(idx: int) None[source]¶
Perform a simulation run over a single simulation time step.
The required argument idx corresponds to property idx_sim (see the main documentation on class
Model).You can integrate method
simulate()into your workflows for tailor-made simulation runs. Methodsimulate()is complete enough to allow for consecutive calls. However, note that it does neither callsave_data(),update_receivers(), norupdate_senders(). Also, one would have to reset the related node sequences, as done in the following example:>>> from hydpy.examples import prepare_full_example_2 >>> hp, pub, TestIO = prepare_full_example_2() >>> model = hp.elements.land_dill.model >>> for idx in range(4): ... model.simulate(idx) ... print(hp.nodes.dill.sequences.sim) ... hp.nodes.dill.sequences.sim = 0.0 sim(11.78038) sim(8.901179) sim(7.131072) sim(6.017787) >>> hp.nodes.dill.sequences.sim.series InfoArray([nan, nan, nan, nan])
The results above are identical to those of method
simulate()of classHydPy, which is the standard method to perform simulation runs (except that methodsimulate()of classHydPyalso performs the steps neglected by methodsimulate()of classModelmentioned above):>>> from hydpy import round_ >>> hp.reset_conditions() >>> hp.simulate() >>> round_(hp.nodes.dill.sequences.sim.series) 11.78038, 8.901179, 7.131072, 6.017787
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.AdHocModel[source]¶
Bases:
RunModelBase class for models solving the underlying differential equations in an “ad hoc manner”.
“Ad hoc” stands for the classical approaches in hydrology to calculate individual fluxes separately (often sequentially) and without error control (Clark and Kavetski, 2010).
- run() None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “run methods” in the defined order.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import AdHocModel, Method >>> class print_1(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(1) >>> class print_2(Method): ... @staticmethod ... def __call__(self): ... print(2) >>> class Test(AdHocModel): ... RUN_METHODS = print_1, print_2 >>> Test().run() 1 2
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.SegmentModel[source]¶
Bases:
RunModelBase class for (routing) models that solve the underlying differential equations “segment-wise”.
“segment-wise” means that
SegmentModelfirst runs the “run methods” for the first segment (by settingidx_segmentto zero), then for the second segment (by settingidx_segmentto one), and so on. Therefore, it requires the concrete model subclass to provide a control parameter named “NmbSegments”. Additionally, it requires the concrete model to implement a solver parameter named “NmbRuns” that defines how many times the “run methods” need to be (repeatedly) executed for each segment. Seemusk_classicandmusk_mctas examples.- idx_segment¶
The segment index.
- idx_run¶
The run index.
- run() None[source]¶
Call all methods defined as “run methods” “segment-wise”.
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- run_segments(method: Method) Tuple[float, ...] | None[source]¶
Run the given methods for all segments.
Method
run_segments()is mainly thought for testing purposes. See the documentation on methodCalc_Discharge_V1on how to apply it.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.SolverModel[source]¶
Bases:
ModelBase class for hydrological models, which solve ordinary differential equations with numerical integration algorithms.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.NumConstsELS[source]¶
Bases:
objectConfiguration options for using the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” implemented by class
ELSModel.You can change the following solver options at your own risk.
>>> from hydpy.core.modeltools import NumConstsELS >>> consts = NumConstsELS()
The maximum number of Runge Kutta submethods to be applied (the higher, the better the theoretical accuracy, but also the worse the time spent unsuccessful when the theory does not apply):
>>> consts.nmb_methods 10
The number of entries to handle the stages of the highest order method (must agree with the maximum number of methods):
>>> consts.nmb_stages 11
The maximum increase of the integration step size in case of success:
>>> consts.dt_increase 2.0
The maximum decrease of the integration step size in case of failure:
>>> consts.dt_decrease 10.0
The Runge Kutta coefficients, one matrix for each submethod:
>>> consts.a_coefs.shape (11, 12, 11)
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.NumVarsELS[source]¶
Bases:
objectIntermediate results of the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” implemented by class
ELSModel.Class
NumVarsELSshould be of relevance for model developers, as it helps to evaluate how efficient newly implemented models are solved (see the documentation on methodsolve()of classELSModelas an example).
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.ELSModel[source]¶
Bases:
SolverModelBase class for hydrological models using the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” for solving ordinary differential equations.
The “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” is a variable order Runge Kutta method combining different Lobatto methods. Its main idea is to first calculate a solution with a lower order method, then to use these results to apply the next higher-order method, and to compare both results. If they are close enough, the latter results are accepted. If not, the next higher-order method is applied (or, if no higher-order method is available, the step size is decreased, and the algorithm restarts with the method of the lowest order). So far, a thorough description of the algorithm is available in German only (Tyralla, 2016).
Note the strengths and weaknesses of class
ELSModeldiscussed in the documentation on methodsolve(). Model developers should not derive from classELSModelwhen trying to implement models with a high potential for stiff parameterisations. Discontinuities should be regularised, for example, by the “smoothing functions” provided by modulesmoothtools. Model users should be careful not to define two small smoothing factors, to avoid needlessly long simulation times.- METHOD_GROUPS: ClassVar[Tuple[str, ...]] = ('RECEIVER_METHODS', 'INLET_METHODS', 'PART_ODE_METHODS', 'FULL_ODE_METHODS', 'ADD_METHODS', 'OUTLET_METHODS', 'SENDER_METHODS')¶
- numconsts: NumConstsELS¶
- numvars: NumVarsELS¶
- simulate(idx: int) None[source]¶
Similar to method
simulate()of classAdHocModelbut calls methodsolve()instead ofrun().When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- solve() None[source]¶
Solve all FULL_ODE_METHODS in parallel.
Implementing numerical integration algorithms that (hopefully) always work well in practice is a tricky task. The following exhaustive examples show how well our “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” algorithm performs for the numerical test models
test_v1andtest_v2. We hope to cover all possible corner cases. Please tell us if you find one we missed.First, we set the value of parameter
Kto zero, resulting in no changes at all and thus defining the simplest test case possible:>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> k(0.0)
Second, we assign values to the solver parameters
AbsErrorMax,RelDTMin, andRelDTMaxto specify the required numerical accuracy and the smallest and largest internal integration step size allowed:>>> solver.abserrormax(0.1) >>> solver.reldtmin(0.001) >>> solver.reldtmax(1.0)
Additionally, we set
RelErrorMaxtonan, which disables taking relative errors into account:>>> solver.relerrormax(nan)
Calling method
solve()correctly calculates zero discharge (Q) and thus does not change the water storage (S):>>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(1.0) >>> fluxes.q q(0.0)
The achieve the above result,
ELSModelrequires two function calls, one for the initial guess (using the Explicit Euler Method) and the other one (extending the Explicit Euler method to the Explicit Heun method) to confirm the first guess meets the required accuracy:>>> model.numvars.idx_method 2 >>> model.numvars.dt 1.0 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 2
With moderate changes due to setting the value of parameter
Kto 0.1, two method calls are still sufficient:>>> k(0.1) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.905) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095) >>> model.numvars.idx_method 2 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 2
Calculating the analytical solution shows
ELSModeldid not exceed the given tolerance value:>>> import numpy >>> from hydpy import round_ >>> round_(numpy.exp(-k)) 0.904837
After decreasing the allowed error by one order of magnitude,
ELSModelrequires four method calls (again, one for the first order and one for the second-order method, and two additional calls for the third-order method):>>> solver.abserrormax(0.001) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.904833) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095167) >>> model.numvars.idx_method 3 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 4
After decreasing
AbsErrorMaxby ten again,ELSModelneeds one further higher-order method, which requires three additional calls, making a sum of seven:>>> solver.abserrormax(0.0001) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.904837) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095163) >>> model.numvars.idx_method 4 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 7
ELSModelachieves even a very extreme numerical precision (just for testing, way beyond hydrological requirements) in one single step but now requires 29 method calls:>>> solver.abserrormax(1e-12) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.904837) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095163) >>> model.numvars.dt 1.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_method 8 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 29
With a more dynamical parameterisation, where the storage decreases by about 40 % per time step,
ELSModelneeds seven method calls to meet a “normal” error tolerance:>>> solver.abserrormax(0.01) >>> k(0.5) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.606771) >>> fluxes.q q(0.393229) >>> model.numvars.idx_method 4 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 7 >>> round_(numpy.exp(-k)) 0.606531
Being an explicit integration method, the “Explicit Lobatto Sequence” can be inefficient for solving stiff initial value problems. Setting
Kto 2.0 forcesELSModelto solve the problem in two substeps, requiring a total of 22 method calls:>>> k(2.0) >>> round_(numpy.exp(-k)) 0.135335 >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.134658) >>> fluxes.q q(0.865342) >>> round_(model.numvars.dt) 0.3 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 22
Increasing the stiffness of the initial value problem further can increase computation times rapidly:
>>> k(4.0) >>> round_(numpy.exp(-k)) 0.018316 >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.019774) >>> fluxes.q q(0.980226) >>> round_(model.numvars.dt) 0.3 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 44
If we prevent
ELSModelfrom compensatingf or its problems by disallowing it to reduce its integration step size, it does not achieve satisfying results:>>> solver.reldtmin(1.0) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.09672) >>> fluxes.q q(0.90328) >>> round_(model.numvars.dt) 1.0 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 46
You can restrict the allowed maximum integration step size, which can help to prevent from loosing to much performance due to trying to solve too stiff problems, repeatedly:
>>> solver.reldtmin(0.001) >>> solver.reldtmax(0.25) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.016806) >>> fluxes.q q(0.983194) >>> round_(model.numvars.dt) 0.25 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 33
Alternatively, you can restrict the available number of Lobatto methods. Using two methods only is an inefficient choice for the given initial value problem but at least solves it with the required accuracy:
>>> solver.reldtmax(1.0) >>> model.numconsts.nmb_methods = 2 >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.020284) >>> fluxes.q q(0.979716) >>> round_(model.numvars.dt) 0.156698 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 74
In the above examples, we control numerical accuracies based on absolute error estimates only via parameter
AbsErrorMax. After assigning an actual value to parameterRelErrorMax,ELSModelalso takes relative errors into account. We modify some of the above examples to show how this works.Generally, it is sufficient to meet one of both criteria. If we repeat the second example with a relaxed absolute but a strict relative tolerance, we reproduce the original result due to our absolute criteria being the relevant one:
>>> solver.abserrormax(0.1) >>> solver.relerrormax(0.000001) >>> k(0.1) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.905) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095)
The same holds for the opposite case of a strict absolute but a relaxed relative tolerance:
>>> solver.abserrormax(0.000001) >>> solver.relerrormax(0.1) >>> k(0.1) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.905) >>> fluxes.q q(0.095)
Reiterating the “more dynamical parameterisation” example results in slightly different but also correct results:
>>> k(0.5) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.607196) >>> fluxes.q q(0.392804)
Reiterating the stiffest example with a relative instead of an absolute error tolerance of 0.1 achieves higher accuracy, as to be expected due to the value of
Sbeing far below 1.0 for some time:>>> k(4.0) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.0185) >>> fluxes.q q(0.9815)
Besides its weaknesses with stiff problems,
ELSModelcannot solve discontinuous problems well. We use thetest_v1example model to demonstrate howELSModelbehaves when confronted with such a problem.>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v2 import * >>> parameterstep()
Everything works fine as long as the discontinuity does not affect the considered simulation step:
>>> k(0.5) >>> solver.abserrormax(0.01) >>> solver.reldtmin(0.001) >>> solver.reldtmax(1.0) >>> solver.relerrormax(nan) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(0.5) >>> fluxes.q q(0.5) >>> model.numvars.idx_method 2 >>> model.numvars.dt 1.0 >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 2
The occurrence of a discontinuity within the simulation step often increases computation times more than a stiff parameterisation:
>>> k(2.0) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(-0.006827) >>> fluxes.q q(1.006827) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 58
>>> k(2.1) >>> states.s(1.0) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls = 0 >>> model.solve() >>> states.s s(-0.00072) >>> fluxes.q q(1.00072) >>> model.numvars.nmb_calls 50
When working in Cython mode, the standard model import overrides this generic Python version with a model-specific Cython version.
- calculate_single_terms() None[source]¶
Apply all methods stored in the PART_ODE_METHODS tuple.
>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> k(0.25) >>> states.s = 1.0 >>> model.calculate_single_terms() >>> fluxes.q q(0.25)
- calculate_full_terms() None[source]¶
Apply all methods stored in the FULL_ODE_METHODS tuple.
>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> k(0.25) >>> states.s.old = 1.0 >>> fluxes.q = 0.25 >>> model.calculate_full_terms() >>> states.s.old 1.0 >>> states.s.new 0.75
- get_point_states() None[source]¶
Load the states corresponding to the actual stage.
>>> from hydpy import round_ >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> states.s.old = 2.0 >>> states.s.new = 2.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._s_points) >>> points[:4] = 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> model.get_point_states() >>> round_(states.s.old) 2.0 >>> round_(states.s.new) 1.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import, print_values >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> states.sv.old = 3.0, 3.0 >>> states.sv.new = 3.0, 3.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._sv_points) >>> points[:4, 0] = 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> points[:4, 1] = 0.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0 >>> model.get_point_states() >>> print_values(states.sv.old) 3.0, 3.0 >>> print_values(states.sv.new) 1.0, 2.0
- set_point_states() None[source]¶
Save the states corresponding to the actual stage.
>>> from hydpy import print_values >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> states.s.old = 2.0 >>> states.s.new = 1.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._s_points) >>> points[:] = 0. >>> model.set_point_states() >>> print_values(points[:4]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> states.sv.old = 3.0, 3.0 >>> states.sv.new = 1.0, 2.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._sv_points) >>> points[:] = 0. >>> model.set_point_states() >>> print_values(points[:4, 0]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> print_values(points[:4, 1]) 0.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0
- set_result_states() None[source]¶
Save the final states of the actual method.
>>> from hydpy import print_values >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> states.s.old = 2.0 >>> states.s.new = 1.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> results = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._s_results) >>> results[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_result_states() >>> print_values(results[:4]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> states.sv.old = 3.0, 3.0 >>> states.sv.new = 1.0, 2.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> results = numpy.asarray(states.fastaccess._sv_results) >>> results[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_result_states() >>> print_values(results[:4, 0]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> print_values(results[:4, 1]) 0.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0
- get_sum_fluxes() None[source]¶
Get the sum of the fluxes calculated so far.
>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> fluxes.q = 0.0 >>> fluxes.fastaccess._q_sum = 1.0 >>> model.get_sum_fluxes() >>> fluxes.q q(1.0)
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import, print_values >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> fluxes.qv = 0.0, 0.0 >>> numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_sum)[:] = 1.0, 2.0 >>> model.get_sum_fluxes() >>> fluxes.qv qv(1.0, 2.0)
- set_point_fluxes() None[source]¶
Save the fluxes corresponding to the actual stage.
>>> from hydpy import print_values >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> fluxes.q = 1.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._q_points) >>> points[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_point_fluxes() >>> print_values(points[:4]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> fluxes.qv = 1.0, 2.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 2 >>> points = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_points) >>> points[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_point_fluxes() >>> print_values(points[:4, 0]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> print_values(points[:4, 1]) 0.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0
- set_result_fluxes() None[source]¶
Save the final fluxes of the actual method.
>>> from hydpy import print_values >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> fluxes.q = 1.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> results = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._q_results) >>> results[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_result_fluxes() >>> from hydpy import round_ >>> print_values(results[:4]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> fluxes.qv = 1.0, 2.0 >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> results = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_results) >>> results[:] = 0.0 >>> model.set_result_fluxes() >>> print_values(results[:4, 0]) 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 >>> print_values(results[:4, 1]) 0.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0
- integrate_fluxes() None[source]¶
Perform a dot multiplication between the fluxes and the A coefficients associated with the different stages of the actual method.
>>> from hydpy import print_values >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 1 >>> model.numvars.dt = 0.5 >>> points = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._q_points) >>> points[:4] = 15.0, 2.0, -999.0, 0.0 >>> model.integrate_fluxes() >>> from hydpy import round_ >>> from hydpy import pub >>> print_values(numpy.asarray(model.numconsts.a_coefs)[1, 1, :2]) 0.375, 0.125 >>> fluxes.q q(2.9375)
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 2 >>> model.numvars.idx_stage = 1 >>> model.numvars.dt = 0.5 >>> points = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_points) >>> points[:4, 0] = 1.0, 1.0, -999.0, 0.0 >>> points[:4, 1] = 15.0, 2.0, -999.0, 0.0 >>> model.integrate_fluxes() >>> print_values(numpy.asarray(model.numconsts.a_coefs)[1, 1, :2]) 0.375, 0.125 >>> fluxes.qv qv(0.25, 2.9375)
- reset_sum_fluxes() None[source]¶
Set the sum of the fluxes calculated so far to zero.
>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> fluxes.fastaccess._q_sum = 5.0 >>> model.reset_sum_fluxes() >>> fluxes.fastaccess._q_sum 0.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import, print_values >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> import numpy >>> sums = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_sum) >>> sums[:] = 5.0, 5.0 >>> model.reset_sum_fluxes() >>> print_values(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_sum) 0.0, 0.0
- addup_fluxes() None[source]¶
Add up the sum of the fluxes calculated so far.
>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> fluxes.fastaccess._q_sum = 1.0 >>> fluxes.q(2.0) >>> model.addup_fluxes() >>> fluxes.fastaccess._q_sum 3.0
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import, print_values >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> sums = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_sum) >>> sums[:] = 1.0, 2.0 >>> fluxes.qv(3.0, 4.0) >>> model.addup_fluxes() >>> print_values(sums) 4.0, 6.0
- calculate_error() None[source]¶
Estimate the numerical error based on the relevant fluxes calculated by the current and the last method.
“Relevant fluxes” are those contained within the SOLVERSEQUENCES tuple. If this tuple is empty, method
calculate_error()selects all flux sequences of the respective model with aTrueNUMERIC attribute.>>> from hydpy import round_ >>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> results = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._q_results) >>> results[:5] = 0.0, 0.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.0 >>> model.numvars.use_relerror = False >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 3 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 1.0 >>> model.numvars.relerror inf
>>> model.numvars.use_relerror = True >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 1.0 >>> round_(model.numvars.relerror) 0.25
>>> model.numvars.idx_method = 4 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 0.0 >>> round_(model.numvars.relerror) 0.0
>>> model.numvars.idx_method = 1 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 0.0 >>> model.numvars.relerror inf
>>> from hydpy import reverse_model_wildcard_import >>> reverse_model_wildcard_import() >>> from hydpy.models.test_v3 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> n(2) >>> model.numvars.use_relerror = True >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 3 >>> results = numpy.asarray(fluxes.fastaccess._qv_results) >>> results[:5, 0] = 0.0, 0.0, -4.0, -2.0, -2.0 >>> results[:5, 1] = 0.0, 0.0, -8.0, -4.0, -4.0 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 4.0 >>> round_(model.numvars.relerror) 1.0
>>> model.numvars.idx_method = 4 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 0.0 >>> round_(model.numvars.relerror) 0.0
>>> model.numvars.idx_method = 1 >>> model.calculate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.abserror) 0.0 >>> model.numvars.relerror inf
- extrapolate_error() None[source]¶
Estimate the numerical error expected when applying all methods available based on the results of the current and the last method.
Note that you cannot apply this extrapolation strategy to the first method. If the current method is the first one, method
extrapolate_error()returns -999.9:>>> from hydpy.models.test_v1 import * >>> parameterstep() >>> model.numvars.use_relerror = False >>> model.numvars.abserror = 0.01 >>> model.numvars.last_abserror = 0.1 >>> model.numvars.idx_method = 10 >>> model.extrapolate_error() >>> from hydpy import round_ >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_abserror) 0.01 >>> model.numvars.extrapolated_relerror inf
>>> model.numvars.use_relerror = True >>> model.numvars.relerror = 0.001 >>> model.numvars.last_relerror = 0.01 >>> model.extrapolate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_abserror) 0.01 >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_relerror) 0.001
>>> model.numvars.idx_method = 9 >>> model.extrapolate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_abserror) 0.001 >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_relerror) 0.0001
>>> model.numvars.relerror = inf >>> model.extrapolate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_relerror) inf
>>> model.numvars.abserror = 0.0 >>> model.extrapolate_error() >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_abserror) 0.0 >>> round_(model.numvars.extrapolated_relerror) 0.0
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.AideSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
AideSequencesAide sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.FactorSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
FactorSequencesFactor sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.FluxSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
FluxSequencesFlux sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.InletSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
InletSequencesInlet sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.InputSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
InputSequencesInput sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.LogSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
LogSequencesLog sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.OutletSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
OutletSequencesOutlet sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.ReceiverSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
ReceiverSequencesReceiver sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.SenderSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
SenderSequencesSender sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.StateSequences(master: Sequences, cls_fastaccess: Type[TypeFastAccess_co] | None = None, cymodel: CyModelProtocol | None = None)¶
Bases:
StateSequencesState sequences of model modeltools.
- class hydpy.core.modeltools.Submodel(model: Model)[source]¶
Bases:
objectBase class for implementing “submodels” that serve to deal with (possibly complicated) general mathematical algorithms (e.g. root-finding algorithms) within hydrological model methods.
You might find class
Submodeluseful when trying to implement algorithms requiring some interaction with the respective model without any Python overhead. See the modulesroottoolsand rootutils as an example, implementing Python interfaces and Cython implementations of a root-finding algorithms, respectively.